Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transcended being a mere technological trend; it is now a core pillar of national competitiveness and security. However, as side effects like deepfakes, fake news, and algorithmic bias emerge, the world faces a monumental task: How do we govern AI safely?
While nations engage in a high-stakes tug-of-war between regulation and innovation, South Korea has officially passed its “Artificial Intelligence Basic Act.” With the enforcement date set for January 22, 2026, let’s explore how Korea’s strategy fits into the global landscape.
🌍 Global AI Governance: Different Philosophies, One Goal
Every major power is taking a distinct approach to “taming” AI, reflecting their unique socio-political values.
- The European Union (EU): “Human Rights First, Strict Oversight” The EU’s AI Act—the world’s first comprehensive AI law—is famously stringent. It categorizes AI by risk levels and outright bans “unacceptable” systems, such as social scoring. With fines reaching up to 7% of global turnover, it is a “regulate-first” model focused on protecting fundamental rights.
- The United States: “Innovation is King, Voluntary Safety” Home to the world’s leading tech giants, the U.S. leans on Executive Orders and voluntary guidelines rather than rigid legislation. The focus is on fostering innovation and national security while encouraging firms to self-test and report safety risks to the government.
- China: “State-Led Control and Sovereignty” China has moved swiftly to ensure AI content aligns with state values. It requires firms to register algorithms with the government and mandates that AI-generated content reflects socialist core values, emphasizing strict state oversight.
💡 The Common Ground
Despite different methods, there is a global consensus on two fronts: managing “High-Risk AI” and ensuring transparency (e.g., watermarking) for generative AI.
🇰🇷 South Korea’s Strategy: “Allow First, Regulate Later”
South Korea has carved out a pragmatic middle ground: the “Allow First, Regulate Later” principle.
Why the “Innovation-First” Approach?
Korea recognizes it lacks the massive capital of the U.S. or the sheer market power of the EU. Implementing heavy-handed regulations too early could stifle domestic startups before they even take flight.
- The Intent: To secure a “Golden Time” for technological advancement. The law opens the door for innovation but establishes a clear framework for accountability if something goes wrong.
🔍 Key Features of the Korean AI Basic Act
The Act strikes a balance between industrial promotion and public trust.
- National Governance: It establishes a “National AI Committee” chaired by the President and an “AI Safety Institute” to serve as a national control tower.
- High-Impact AI Management: AI used in critical sectors like healthcare, recruitment, and finance is designated as “High-Impact AI.” Providers of these systems must meet specific reliability and safety standards.
- Generative AI Transparency: Mandatory watermarking for AI-generated content (images, videos) is now law. Users must be clearly informed when they are interacting with an AI. (Violations carry fines of up to 30 million KRW).
- Domestic Representation: To ensure accountability, foreign AI giants providing services in Korea must appoint a domestic representative to handle legal and safety issues.
📅 The Roadmap: What to Watch For
The government plans to finalize subordinate statutes (enforcement decrees) and detailed guidelines by the first half of 2025. Then, on January 22, 2026, the law officially takes effect.
Key Observation Points
- Enforcement Effectiveness: Critics wonder if a 30 million KRW fine is enough to sway global Big Tech. Whether the “regulate later” approach can prevent irreparable harm remains to be seen.
- The Digital Divide: A major focus will be ensuring that the benefits of AI are not concentrated in a few conglomerates but are shared with SMEs and the general public.
Closing Thoughts South Korea’s AI Basic Act is a historic first step. Being one of the first nations to implement a comprehensive framework is a badge of honor, but the real challenge lies in evolving the law as AI continues to change our world. As 2026 approaches, we are not just watching a law take effect—we are witnessing the birth of a new social contract between humans and machines.
About the Author
AI FOCUS에서 더 알아보기
구독을 신청하면 최신 게시물을 이메일로 받아볼 수 있습니다.
